Liberal Democrat Councillor for Dene Ward Learn more
by wendytaylor on 11 December, 2012
Many wonder just why Newcastle City Council intends such savage cuts to valued services when other councils are avoiding wholesale slash and burn.
For example Newcastle will close ten libraries whilst Durham County will reduce opening hours but close none. Gateshead will continue to fund the arts but not Newcastle. The Council leadership would have you believe that Newcastle is being singled out and has to cope with the biggest cuts of all.
There’s no doubt that councils in areas of greatest deprivation and disadvantage are bearing the biggest cuts – they rightly get much more in the first place. But what are the facts? Four of the other eleven councils in our region are worse-off than Newcastle. It has lost £142 per head whilst Sunderland, Middlesbrough, Hartlepool and South Tyneside have lost more – in the latter two cases over £180 per head.
It’s not that the North East as a whole is losing more than any other region, because North West councils have, cumulatively, lost more. And it’s not a north v south issue. Cities like Birmingham and Nottingham have lost more than Newcastle, whilst some London boroughs are the hardest hit of all. Hackney has lost £244 per head to date, Newham £226.
This year Newcastle still receives £558 per head from government under the formula. Wokingham, quoted as being let off lightest of all unitary authorities, receives £119 per head support.
Strangely, many council areas that receive less per head than Newcastle from government actually get less on average from their own council tax too. Hull gets £541 per head in grant but only £854 per property in council tax compared to Newcastle’s £1039 average. Doncaster gets £450 per head in grant but only £889 in council tax per property.
All this tells us that the local government funding formula is not fit for purpose. In its 13 years in Government Labour had opportunities to make it fairer and simpler – but didn’t.
Newcastle’s Labour politicians would have you believe that the Government cuts amount to £90m. Actually, the cuts are estimated at £39m spread over three years by the council, the other £51m being a whole range of other financial pressures and commitments. However, note that the grant reduction for next year is under £9m out of £158m. So we ask again, why the slash and burn?
Councils have choices – choices about the level of council tax, which services to cut, how to save money by sharing services or exiting unprofitable trading activities. Newcastle chooses to spend one million pounds on the “living wage” supplement when no other council in the region thinks it’s the right time to trade off jobs and services for wages. Newcastle also chooses to take on more staff to support Labour politicians – an outrage.
We will challenge the council on the choices they have made, as we do not agree with many of their draconian service cuts. These are tough times but residents should not be taken in by the spin and bluster.
BUDGET INFO – FORMULA GRANT TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES: CONTEXT
(Newcastle Finance Director’s own figures from his heat map, TOTAL AREA CHANGE 10/11 In Yr Cuts, 11/12 & 12/13 Cuts Inc Transition & New Ctax Freeze Grant &Prov NHB Allocs)
Hackney-£244.91
Liverpool-£228.56
Knowsley-£227.74
Newham-£226.73
Tower Hamlets -£196.22
Manchester-£191.41
Blackburn with Darwen -£187.84
South Tyneside -£182.65
Hartlepool-£180.51
Islington-£179.24
St Helens-£162.70
Southwark-£161.42
Rochdale-£158.27
Middlesbrough-£156.47
Haringey-£154.10
Kingston upon Hull-£149.26
Birmingham-£149.03
Lambeth-£148.00
Greenwich-£146.30
Sunderland-£145.35
Halton -£144.90
Doncaster-£144.04
Nottingham-£143.16
NEWCASTLE 142.74
Salford -£142.03
North East Lincolnshire -£139.57
Camden-£138.58
Redcar and Cleveland-£138.03
Oldham -£135.62
Gateshead-£132.81
Examples – Nottingham £551 Sheffield £472 Bristol £383 Leeds £358 among the core cities
Plus some other districts who worse than Newcastle in the index of multiple deprivation:
Bradford £488
Rochdale £519
Blackburn £550
Hull £541
Stoke £510
Hartlepool £527
Halton £525
Doncaster £450
Bolton £432
Oldham £511
Walsall £507
Note1 : More – Liverpool £713 Manchester £658 Birmingham £615 and some others high in the deprivation list
Note 2 – Wokingham figure is £119 per head, the lowest of all unitary authorities.
Most deprived places in England in order SOURCE: DCLG
Liverpool District – 1
Hackney
Newham
Manchester District
Knowsley District
Blackpool
Tower Hamlets
Middlesbrough
Birmingham District
Hull – 10
Burnley District
Sandwell District
Haringey
Islington
Waltham Forest
Stoke-on-Trent
Blackburn with Darwen
Salford
Hastings
Nottingham
Wolverhampton
Barking &Dagenham
Rochdale
Hartlepool
Leicester
Bradford
Halton
Greenwich
Lambeth
Walsall District
Lewisham
Barrow-in-Furness
Pendle
Hyndburn
Brent
Bolton
Oldham
Mansfield
Doncaster
Newcastle – 40
Southwark
Tameside
Gateshead
Sunderland
Preston
However, many councils have a lower AVERAGE council tax take than Newcastle’s £1039
Wandsworth 663
Westminster 777
Manchester 817
Hull UA 854
Doncaster 889
Sunderland 904
Sandwell 912
Birmingham 925
Wakefield 931
Tameside 941
City London 944
Stoke 946
Bradford 953
Newham 957
STyneside 958
Derby 961
Liverpool 961
Dudley 961
Barnsley 962
Halton 971
Wigan 971
Leicester 976
Southwark 989
Lincoln 992
Portsmouth 998
Leeds 998
Knowsley 1000
Bolton 1003
St Helens 1008
Barking 1009
Rotherham 1010
Southampton 1015
Boston 1016
Hackney 1017
Sheffield 1017
Blackburn 1018
Nottingham 1019
Coventry 1025
Wolverhmptn 1026
Salford 1027
Peterborough 1028
Hyndburn 1028
Rochdale 1029
Lambeth 1032
Blackpool 1032
Greenwich 1033
Twer Hamlets 1034
Corby 1034
Leave a comment
Leave a Reply